Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---

On 10/30/2024 6:17 AM, Andy Walker wrote:

On 30/10/2024 03:50, Jeff Barnett wrote:

You may have noticed that the moron responded to your message in
less than 10 minutes. Do you think he read the material before
responding? A good troll would have waited a few hours before
answering.

      I doubt whether Peter is either a moron or a troll.  Rather, as
I have previously pointed out, he is playing "Fetch" with anyone who is
prepared to play [which I am not, and nor are most other readers here].
A troll would perpetrate a somewhat cranky idea and then sit back an
watch everyone else argue to and fro without participating further, other
than to stoke the fires occasionally.  Peter will reply instantly to
anyone who will reply to him.  So, sadly, though less instantly, will
several others.  I suspect they are rather lonely attention seekers,
but as I am not a psychiatrist this is not a professional opinion.
 

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
*That people fail to agree with this and also fail to*
*correctly point out any error seems to indicate dishonestly*
*or lack of technical competence*
DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantics of the x86
language cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction
whether or not any HHH ever aborts its emulation of DDD.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer