Re: Can D simulated by H terminate normally?

On 4/28/24 9:06 AM, olcott wrote:

On 4/28/2024 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-04-28 01:54:23 +0000, olcott said:
>

It is psychotic that people really believes that the principle of
explosion is valid inference even though there is zero doubt the it
derives the non-sequitur error.

>
 From a false proposistion everthing follows so there is no
non-sequitur error. Instead, inference from a false propsition
is unsound. Although an unsound inference is not an error,
using the result as if were soundly proven is.
>

 It seems that far more people are indoctrinated into dogma
than can correctly apply correct reasoning:
 Proposition A is True.
Proposition A is False.
Therefore B
 Translated into a syllogism:
 All A are True
  No A are True
Therefore B
 *It is categorically impossible to show*
(a) How the above two categorical propositions entail B.
(b) That the above syllogism is not isomorphic to POE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_proposition
 

Then what was wrong with the proof I gave.
It is hard to convincingly say something is impossible to show, when it has been.
That just makes you look totally stupid, which you have proven time and time again that you are.