Sujet : Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 08. May 2024, 05:16:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1eqpg$3nnch$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/7/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 10:33 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 10:40 AM, olcott wrote:
>
It is the one that prove you don't tell the truth.
If you don't tell the truth about one thing then you
can't be trusted on the next.
>
And thus, I guess we can just ignore everything you say, as you have been proven to lie many times in the past.
>
I have never been proven to ever lie yet I did prove
that you told a falsehood. I assume this was unintentional
spouting off before you bothered to pay attention.
>
That is a LIE.
You have just ignored every proof that you lied because you are just like that pillow guy.
That you claim to have proof just like the pillow guy
claims to have proof is ridiculously implausible on
the basis of your spouting off nonsense on this same
point.
>
Nope, I have SHOWN the proof.
YOU ignored it.
I completely ignored all of your messages for quite
a while, possibly weeks. Most of your messages were
hardly anything bedsides ad hominem attacks.
Are you willing to put up or shut up?
or are you going to be chicken and just keep making your false statements that you don't beleive strongly enough to take a risk on them.
I guess you are just a chicken liar.
You have never not even once gone through every single
detail of any of my reasoning.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer