Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 08. May 2024, 21:08:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1giju$4imh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/8/2024 11:07 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-08 13:01:54 +0000, olcott said:
 
On 5/8/2024 3:59 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-07 19:05:54 +0000, olcott said:
>
On 5/7/2024 1:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 07.mei.2024 om 17:40 schreef olcott:
On 5/7/2024 6:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-06 18:28:37 +0000, olcott said:
>
On 5/6/2024 11:19 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-05 17:02:25 +0000, olcott said:
>
The x86utm operating system: https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm enables
one C function to execute another C function in debug step mode.
Simulating Termination analyzer H simulates the x86 machine code of its
input (using libx86emu) in debug step mode until it correctly matches a
correct non-halting behavior pattern proving that its input will never
stop running unless aborted.
>
Can D correctly simulated by H terminate normally?
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
>
*Execution Trace*
Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D);
>
*keeps repeating* (unless aborted)
Line 03: simulated D(D) invokes simulated H(D,D) that simulates D(D)
>
*Simulation invariant*
D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03.
>
The above execution trace proves that (for every H/D pair of the
infinite set of H/D pairs) each D(D) simulated by the H that this D(D)
calls cannot possibly reach past its own line 03.
>
When you say "every H/D pair" you should specify which set of pairs
you are talking about. As you don't, your words don't mean anything.
>
>
Every H/D pair in the universe where D(D) is simulated by the
same H(D,D) that D(D) calls. This involves 1 to ∞ steps of D
and also includes zero to ∞ recursive simulations where H
H simulates itself simulating D(D).
>
"In the universe" is not a set. In typical set theories like ZFC there
is no universal set.
>
>
This template defines an infinite set of finite string H/D pairs where each D(D) that is simulated by H(D,D) also calls this same H(D,D).
>
These H/D pairs can be enumerated by the one to ∞ simulated steps of D and involve zero to ∞ recursive simulations of H simulating itself simulating D(D). Every time Lines 1,2,3 are simulated again defines
one more level of recursive simulation.
>
1st element of H/D pairs 1 step  of D  is simulated by H
2nd element of H/D pairs 2 steps of D are simulated by H
3rd element of H/D pairs 3 steps of D are simulated by H
>
4th element of H/D pairs 4 steps of D are simulated by H
this begins the first recursive simulation at line 01
>
5th element of H/D pairs 5 steps of D are simulated by
next step of the first recursive simulation at line 02
>
6th element of H/D pairs 6 steps of D are simulated by
last step of the first recursive simulation at line 03
>
7th element of H/D pairs 7 steps of D are simulated by H
this begins the second recursive simulation at line 01
>
Is this the definition of the infinite set of H? We can think of many more simulations that only these.
>
This template defines an infinite set of finite string H/D pairs where
each D(D) that is simulated by H(D,D) also calls this same H(D,D).
>
No-one can possibly show one element of this set where D(D) reaches
past its own line 03.
>
If H is a decider of any kind then the D build from it reaches its line
4 as numberd above. Whether the simulation of D by H reaches that line
is another question.
>
>
*My fully operational code proves otherwise*
 No, it doesn't.
 
I seems like you guys don't have a clue about how infinite
recursion works.
 Sure we know. It works so that the program that does it never
returns and therefore is not any deider, and the calling
program doesn't return, either, so it isn't a decider, either.
 
*In other words you agree with this*
*In other words you agree with this*
*In other words you agree with this*
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
Any H/D pair matching the above template where D(D) is simulated
by the same H(D,D) that it calls cannot possibly reach past
it own line 03. Simple software engineering verified fact.

 You can run the code and see that I am correct.
 Even without running the code it is clear that your "proves otherwise"
is false.
 
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 May 24 * Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H643olcott
5 May 24 +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H64Richard Damon
5 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
5 May 24 ii`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
5 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H43olcott
5 May 24 ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H42Richard Damon
5 May 24 ii +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H18olcott
5 May 24 ii i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H17Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H16olcott
6 May 24 ii i  +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H11Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii i  ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii i  ii  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii i  i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii i  i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
7 May 24 ii i  i     `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4Mikko
6 May 24 ii i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3olcott
7 May 24 ii i    +- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii i    `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Mikko
6 May 24 ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H23olcott
6 May 24 ii  +- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H --- typo1olcott
6 May 24 ii  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H21Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H10olcott
6 May 24 ii   i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H9Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii   i i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii   i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii   i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
7 May 24 ii   i      `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii   i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii   i  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---4olcott
6 May 24 ii      `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii       `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---2olcott
7 May 24 ii        `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---1Richard Damon
5 May 24 i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H18olcott
5 May 24 i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
5 May 24 i i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 i i `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
7 May 24 i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H14immibis
7 May 24 i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++13olcott
7 May 24 i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++10Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++8olcott
7 May 24 i   ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++7Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++6olcott
7 May 24 i   ii  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++5Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++4olcott
7 May 24 i   ii    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++3Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++2olcott
8 May 24 i   ii      `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++1Richard Damon
9 May 24 i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++1immibis
9 May 24 i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++2immibis
9 May 24 i    `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1olcott
6 May 24 +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H577Mikko
6 May 24 i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H576olcott
7 May 24 i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H45Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===44olcott
7 May 24 i i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===43Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===42olcott
7 May 24 i i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===41Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===40olcott
7 May 24 i i     +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===38Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i     i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===37olcott
7 May 24 i i     i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===36Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i     i  +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===6olcott
8 May 24 i i     i  i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===5Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i  i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===4olcott
8 May 24 i i     i  i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===3Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i  i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
8 May 24 i i     i  i    `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===1Richard Damon
7 May 24 i i     i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===29olcott
8 May 24 i i     i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===28Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===23olcott
8 May 24 i i     i    i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===22Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i    i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===21olcott
8 May 24 i i     i    i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===20Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i    i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@19olcott
8 May 24 i i     i    i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@11olcott
8 May 24 i i     i    i    i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@10Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i    i    i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@9olcott
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@8Richard Damon
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2olcott
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1Richard Damon
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2olcott
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1Richard Damon
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@3olcott
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2Richard Damon
9 May 24 i i     i    i    i     `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1joes
8 May 24 i i     i    i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@7Richard Damon
8 May 24 i i     i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
8 May 24 i i     i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
9 May 24 i i     `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===1immibis
7 May 24 i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H530Mikko
7 May 24 `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1immibis

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal