Re: Is Richard a Liar?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Is Richard a Liar?
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.com (joes)
Groupes : sci.logic comp.theory
Date : 15. May 2024, 18:20:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v22ncp$14b7c$1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 15 May 2024 10:10:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said:
 
*Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest*
First you should prove that you know C.
Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely on an
argument from authority.
Contradiction in three lines.

Anyone that knows C and claims that I am wrong either provides the
required single valid counter-example proving that I am wrong or meets
the [definition] of defamation cases.
Or doesn’t care.

--
joes

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Nov 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal