Re: Is Richard a Liar? No!

On 5/15/24 12:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 5/15/2024 9:54 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

[ Followup-To: set ]
>
In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/15/2024 8:40 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

>

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/14/2024 1:30 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 14.mei.2024 om 19:52 schreef olcott:

On 5/14/2024 12:49 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

>

[ .... ]

>

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

>

[ .... ]

>

00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }

>

[ .... ]

>

But nobody here knows the proof for your assertion above, that it
is a verified fact that it cannot reach past line 03. So, we would
like to see that proof. Just the claim that it has been proven is
not enough.

>

The "nobody here" you are referring to must be clueless
about the semantics of the C programming language.

>

Are you honest? Please, give the proof, instead of keeping away from it.

>

I have been an expert C/C++ programmer for decades.

>

I see evidence to the contrary.  You may have dabbled in C twenty
years ago, or so, but if you were an expert C/C++ programmer, you
would not have written those twelve lines so carelessly that they
don't even compile.

>

*I have told you that this is a template previously*

>
Whatever that might mean, you have asserted (or at least implied) that
that code was written in C, whether you call it a template or not.
>
You are not an expert in C, see above.  Given your known penchant for
telling untruths,

 That by itself is defamation.
 No one has even proven that my statements are false.

I did, and you refuse to answer about it, proving you are just a pathological lying due to YOUR reckless disregard for the truth.
And, apparently you think I might have a case, as you aren't willing to accept the put up or snut up challange, as when you are shown wrong, your main weapon, claiming people haven't refuted you becomes an admission of lying.

 The usual "proof" that my statements are false is empty rhetoric
entirely bereft of any supporting reasoning or ad hominem attacks.

THAT is defamation.

 Relying in such "evidence" is the reckless disregard for the truth
of defamation.

Nope, YOU are committing reckless disregard for the truth, which you are even admitting by not directly challenging me by accepting my challenge.
If I didn't post what I claim, I would be force to admit it, but if I did, you would be admitting that you have been lying for that past days, and would have agreed to never again claim you haven't been refuted.

 https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html
 

there is nothing posted in this newsgroup suggesting
you have expertise in C coding, and much suggesting the contrary.
>

*Ignoring this are repeating the above claims are the*
*reckless disregard for the truth of defamation cases*

>
Then sue me for defamation.  You might have to learn a bit of German,
first.
>

 When I prove that IT IS defamation (as I have) that destroys your
credibility.

I when the post is presented that proves you wrong, you lose, and lose the counter case.

 

*Failing to provide the single counter-example required to show*
*that I am incorrect because you know such a counter-example*
*does not exist IS DEFAMATION*

>
A counter example to an assertion about some code that doesn't even
compile?  Quite honestly, I can't be bothered.  Richard has already given
one.  Besides, the burden of proof for your assertion lies on you.  You
have given no proof, so far, and as already stated, you likely don't even
understand what the word proof means.
>

https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/reckless-disregard-of-the-truth.html

>

00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }

>

Any H/D pair matching the above template where
D(D) is simulated by the same H(D,D) that it calls
cannot possibly reach past its own line 03.
This is a simple software engineering verified fact.

>
And that last sentence is (yet another) lie.
>

 That you call it a lie without any evidence that it is
false IS DEFAMATION.

I did, and you refuse to answer about it, proving you are just a pathological lying due to YOUR reckless disregard for the truth.
And, apparently you think I might have a case, as you aren't willing to accept the put up or snut up challange, as when you are shown wrong, your main weapon, claiming people haven't refuted you becomes an admission of lying.

 

-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

>