Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts

On 5/16/2024 9:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 5/16/24 9:15 PM, olcott wrote:

The following is self-evidently true on the basis of the
semantics of the C programming language.

 Which proves that you don't understand that C programming language, or how logic work.
 

>
typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x);
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12   return 0;
13 }
>
In the above case a simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly
emulates at least one of the x86 instructions of D in the order
specified by the x86 instructions of D.
>
This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H
in the order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling
H(D,D) in recursive simulation.
>
Any H/D pair matching the above template where
D(D) is simulated by the same H(D,D) that it calls
cannot possibly reach its own line 06 and halt.
>
*This is a simple software engineering verified fact*
>

 No, THAT IS A OLCOTT LIE.
 I proved it wrong in a post I made about two weeks ago, which you read, simce you replied to it, but didn't even attempt to refute the arguement I made.

*Provide the message ID or YOUR ARE A LIAR*
*Provide the message ID or YOUR ARE A LIAR*
*Provide the message ID or YOUR ARE A LIAR*
*Provide the message ID or YOUR ARE A LIAR*
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer