Sujet : Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 26. May 2024, 02:45:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2u0o5$33mgp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/25/2024 6:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 7:23 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2024 6:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 7:11 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 6:53 PM, olcott wrote:
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
>
No we need to handle them to know what you have defined.
>
After all, if we don't agree on the inmplications, we don't have agreement on what is being stipuated as the defintions.
>
>
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>
>
They are not "Baseless" but based on the actual definitions of the terms that you are changing.
>
>
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
>
Didn't say that, which shows you to be a liar, or at least being deceptive, which is why we need to handle the implications first
>
(Note, you are just proving that you don't understand how logic works)
>
>
The implications of your specifications are:
>
1) That your H is NOT a computation equivalent for a Turing machine.
>
>
OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST
Nope, necessary condition to talk, about the subject line.
I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE
STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE.
I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE
STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE.
I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE
STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…