Re: The error of the halting problem

On 6/3/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/3/24 10:14 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/3/2024 8:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/3/24 9:51 PM, olcott wrote:

>
When H is asked a yes/no question where both answers are
contradicted by its input *IT IS A FREAKING RIGGED GAME*

>
But both answers aren't wrong. Remember, the question is built to make a SPECIFIC decider wrong, and by its algorithm, it will give a SPECIFIC answer to each SPECIFIC question.
>

>
You can't get away with that head game by pretending
to not understand what infinite an set of H/D pairs is.

 But it doesn't matter.
 

It matters enormously. Once we fully understand that the limits
of computation were always a ruse then we can give computation
the priority that it truly deserves. It might be the life on earth
is killed off because we did not build a semantic lie detector
quickly enough.

The key is that EVERY element of that infinite set gives the wrong answer for its particular input, or it doesn't answer (which is also a "wrong answer").
 

Only because of the Liar Paradox ruse.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer