Sujet : Re: The error of the halting problem
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 04. Jun 2024, 04:32:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3lubr$8kuk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/3/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/3/24 10:14 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/3/2024 8:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/3/24 9:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>
When H is asked a yes/no question where both answers are
contradicted by its input *IT IS A FREAKING RIGGED GAME*
>
But both answers aren't wrong. Remember, the question is built to make a SPECIFIC decider wrong, and by its algorithm, it will give a SPECIFIC answer to each SPECIFIC question.
>
>
You can't get away with that head game by pretending
to not understand what infinite an set of H/D pairs is.
But it doesn't matter.
It matters enormously. Once we fully understand that the limits
of computation were always a ruse then we can give computation
the priority that it truly deserves. It might be the life on earth
is killed off because we did not build a semantic lie detector
quickly enough.
The key is that EVERY element of that infinite set gives the wrong answer for its particular input, or it doesn't answer (which is also a "wrong answer").
Only because of the Liar Paradox ruse.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…