Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 6/7/2024 12:32 AM, Mikko wrote:But I do not falsely defame you. Your own words prove that may description of you is correct.On 2024-06-06 14:56:28 +0000, olcott said:When anyone defames me or my work I must counter
>On 6/6/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-06-06 14:27:41 +0000, olcott said:>
>The common meaning of the term [lie] is>
>
noun
(1) a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive;
an intentional untruth.
>
verb (used without object)
(1) to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with
intent to deceive. Synonyms: fib, prevaricate
>
When Richard calls people liars and does not mean they have any
intent to deceive this makes Richard a liar because Richard knows
that people will be lead to believe that he is using the common
definition that requires an intent to deceive.
>
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
In some places the subject line may be regareded aa a crime unless
its author can present an acceptable proof of it.
>
It is often regarded as a bad manner to put names of people
to the subject line.
>
According to Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lie#Etymology_2
a possible meaning is 'To be mistaken or unintentionally spread false
information'.
>
Richard intends for people to get the false impression thus Richard
lies with intent to deceive.
In some (but not all) paĺacess saying that is a crime unless you can
prove your words in a way that is accepted by a judge (or whatever
the local laws happen to require).
>
Anyway, moral and legal issues are of topic in comp.theory.
>
this defamation in the place where it occurred.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.