Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard

[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

[ .... ]

If people are going to be dishonest about simple things such as the
actual behavior of actual x86 code where they consistently deny
verified facts ....

You should stop swearing.  "Verified facts" has a meaning, and that
meaning isn't "false things Peter Olcott would like to be true".

You've been dishonest about verified facts right from the beginning.  For
example, the Halting Theorem is a conclusively proven verified fact.
Your refusing to accept that has just led to an enormous waste of
people's time, most notably your own.

.... then we certainly cannot trust these people with more difficult
issues that require at least some slight degree of judgment call.

I trust "these people".  I do not, and cannot, trust you.

When we can show that even in the halting problem HH
is only required to report on the behavior of DD correctly
simulated by HH these dishonest people merely use that
as another deflection point for their dishonesty.

The above is a distortion of the truth.  The dishonesty here is not
"theirs".

The way around this that just worked is to stay diligently
focused one one single point until the dishonest people
finally admit that they have simply ignored all the proofs
for three solid years.

Otherwise known as spamming the newsgroup.  The word "proof" also has a
meaning, and that meaning isn't "false statements repeated ad nauseam by
Peter Olcott".  You should stop misusing that word.  It means something
you don't understand.

[ .... ]

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).