Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0

On 6/25/2024 3:44 PM, joes wrote:

Am Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:04:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/24/2024 2:36 PM, joes wrote:

 

AFACT HH1 is the same as HH0, right? What happens when HH1 tries to
simulate a function DD1 that only calls HH1?

HH1 terminates, right?
 

I am going to have to go through my code and standardize my names.

Yes, please.

H(P,P) was the original name. Then I had to make a one parameter
version, a version that is identical to H, except P does not call it and
then versions using different algorithms. People have never been able to
understand the different algorithm.

Can you explain them?
 

I can't do that now because I have to change too much of
the code and I can't use the names that are in code in my
paper because they are too complex.
H0/H1 in my brand new paper are HHH/HHH1 in my code for input
DDD. H in my paper is HH in my code, there is an HH1 in my code
that is not referenced in my paper.
There are a bunch of functions that use the 0,1,2 to
mean number of parameters.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer