Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH --- Richard proves that he is clueless

On 7/2/2024 8:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/2/24 9:54 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/2/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/2/24 9:42 PM, olcott wrote:

>
The Tarski proof directly provides the detailed inference steps.
So it is not that I do under understand the Gödel proof it is that
this proof is opaque completely hiding all of the important details.

>
No, you miss the fact that you are starting in the MIDDLE of an arguement, and that what you are thinking as a assumption is a proven statement (which you don't understand)
>

>
You can't correct my error because you know that you have no understanding of the Tarski proof. It is the same tactic as
always dishonestly deflect rather than make any attempt to
correct to hide the fact that you are clueless.
>
>

 Nope, I WON'T correct your error, because you have proved yourself to be a LIAR.
 

You just proved that you are clueless.

I have explained it in the past, but you will not listen, because you have brainwashed yourself into beliving your own lies
 Until you either provide the Diagonalization proof you said you had, or

*I never freaking said that I freaking had this*
I know that it does prove that G is unprovable yet is
horse shit because it totally hides why G is unprovable.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer