Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...

Op 04.jul.2024 om 05:21 schreef olcott:

On 7/3/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/3/24 10:41 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/3/2024 9:34 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/3/24 10:05 PM, olcott wrote:

>
You are not paying close enough attention to the exact words
that I am saying. DDD cannot possibly reach past its own
machine address 0000217a no matter what the Hell that HHH does.
>
>

>
OF course it can. HHH might not be able to simulate it getting there,

>
Because the machine instructions provided to HHH specify that
it is not possible to go there. HHH uses an x86 emulator with
two decades of development effort.

>
No, the exact same instructions that HHH used when called by main are in the presentation to HHH by DDD,

>
That is false and you are too indoctrinated to notice verified facts.
>
HHH1 and directly executed DDD(DDD) benefit from
HHH(DDD) having already aborted its simulation.
HHH cannot possibly reap this same benefit.

 Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself. Because it aborts too soon.
 

>
Maybe I need to repeat this in every reply.
>

 Yes and remember that, therefore, HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself.