Sujet : Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters --- Ben agrees
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 09. Jul 2024, 03:53:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <9230f3ba65ba4424b908878855c7d15785fda294@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/8/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/8/2024 8:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/8/24 8:51 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/8/2024 7:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/8/24 8:21 PM, olcott wrote:
>
>
When you need groceries you cannot say that you
don't need groceries until AFTER you get more groceries.
>
>
Which is just Red Herring, as I am not a program, and the program is not me.
>
>
Free will does not make lies into truth.
If HHH reports that DDD does not need to abort
DDD before HHH aborts DDD then HHH is a liar.
>
How can HHH "report" something while it is still running?
>
The way that IT DOES report something while it is still
running. You love to disagree with verified facts.
Computation can not report answers while running.
YOu are just showing your stupidity.
…