Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise --- eternal september failure

On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/8/24 8:28 PM, olcott wrote:

>
Every expression of language that cannot be proven
or refuted by any finite or infinite sequence of
truth preserving operations connecting it to its
meaning specified as a finite expression of language
is rejected.
>

 So?
 Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
 

Every time that you affirm your above error you prove
yourself to be a liar.
On 7/8/2024 9:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > No, infinite "proofs" determine TRUTH, not knowledge.
You could just say, "I didn't say that correctly"
and we would be done.
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my work
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my work
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my work
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer