Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:What error?On 7/8/24 8:28 PM, olcott wrote:Every time that you affirm your above error you prove>>
Every expression of language that cannot be proven
or refuted by any finite or infinite sequence of
truth preserving operations connecting it to its
meaning specified as a finite expression of language
is rejected.
>
So?
>
Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>
yourself to be a liar.
On 7/8/2024 9:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Right, an infinite "proof", in quotes because that is the term YOU use, even though there is no such thing, but in actuality it is an infinite chain of truth preserving operations DO establish that something is True in the system, but by being infinite, we can never dirrectly follow that path to know it. But, there may be a meta-theory that gives us a short-cut path (like in Godel or Tarski) where we know that the statement is true, and thus can show that the infinite chain does exist.
> No, infinite "proofs" determine TRUTH, not knowledge.
You could just say, "I didn't say that correctly"
and we would be done.
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*And I will keep on pointing out yor STUPID LIES.
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my workNo, peopel will see that YOU are the pathological liar.
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my work
People need to know that you lie in your reviews of my work
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.