On 2025-10-27, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:Here is the codeOn 10/26/2025 9:15 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:Aha!On 2025-10-26 19:58, olcott wrote:>On 10/26/2025 8:50 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:>*Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit*>
And
How the hell is that a response to the word 'And'? At least quote enough
material that its apparent what you are responding to.
>
André
>
He is trying to get away with spamming me with
deceit so I erase all of it and keep ridiculing
So you finally appreciate how it looks like spamming when you are on the
receiving end of these god-forsaken x86utm execution traces!
You pathetic sack of shit, unable to respond to /code/!
A straight forward sequence of steps that any
C programmer can easily determine:
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this
again and again until HHH figures out what is up.
Calling people dishonest while dodging findings from an independentThe crux of everything that can be said about
third party review of your apparatus.
HHH(DD) is summed up in the above 15 lines.
You are a disgrace to STEM.I am not the one dishonestly dodging the single
point that sums up most all of my work.
Your HHH is lousy; it says that DDD is non termninating, whenI am only talking about the HHH in the fifteen
DDD is this non-diagonal case: void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; }.
lines of text immediately above.
HHH(DDD) can return 1; why doesn't it?That HHH does not even say what it returns.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.