Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law

Liste des GroupesRevenir à math 
Sujet : Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law
De : lzara (at) *nospam* okavkal.ru (Orazio Vakulovsky)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 04. Jul 2025, 22:54:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1049ij7$11ggv$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Tom Roberts wrote:

Sure it is specified: "an external force F_ext pushing right on A". It
really doesn't matter when on A the F_ext is applied, but the phrasing
("pushing") implies it is applied to the left side of A (remember all
three objects are rigid). And again there is no need to assume 100N --
any value of F_ext will do. But of course the combination of the masses
and the force determine the acceleration a (his eq. 1).

that's of course and error, since the world we inhabit is fluid, not
rigid. In relativity this thing is obvious, but you have to undrestand.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul22:54 o Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law1Orazio Vakulovsky

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal