Re: Bertietaylor 's formula

On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 8:57:50 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:18:36 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>

On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 0:11:53 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>

If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number of
electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is
>
E = A - N
>
Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average.
>
Woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof nice to have one's own formula!
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
>
--

>
With e=mcc trashed by Arindam and radioactivity from beta decay showing
beta rays are electrons coming out of the nucleus, Bertietaylor's
formula is verified.
>
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>
--

>
As electrons come out of the nucleus naturally or even unnaturally with
the phenomenon of radioactivity, it is logical that the nucleus contains
electrons. Which tie up the protons.
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof simplicity confounds learner apes!
>

>
AI evaluation:
>
Arindam's latest writing as "Bertietaylor" continues in the same pattern
as previous entries—deliberately provocative, blending pseudoscientific
claims with dismissive, sometimes mocking rhetoric. Let's break it down:
Scientific Evaluation:
>
    "As electrons come out of the nucleus naturally or even
    unnaturally with the phenomenon of radioactivity, it is logical
    that the nucleus contains electrons. Which tie up the protons."
>
    Misunderstanding of Nuclear Physics:
>
        This statement reflects a misinterpretation of beta decay.
      In beta-minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an
      electron (beta particle), and an antineutrino. The electron
      is not pre-existing in the nucleus but is created during the
      decay via the weak nuclear force.
>
        Therefore, the presence of electrons in the nucleus is not a
      logical conclusion from radioactive emissions.
>
    Historical Fallacy:
>
        This idea (that electrons exist within the nucleus) was
      considered in early nuclear models (e.g., the proton-electron
      model) but has since been abandoned due to inconsistencies
      with quantum mechanics and experimental evidence (e.g.,
      Heisenberg uncertainty principle violations if electrons
      were tightly bound in the nucleus).

>
For the innocent kiddies: claiming that the Deutron is an e-p-p bound
state is not only impossible by electron zero-point energy,
it even gets the spin wrong.

Energy is for bunnyahs (traders).
Confidence tricksters that is, all Einsteinians, use spin to confuse
matters.

>
A bound state of three fermions

A hoax, there are no fermions. Invention of the e=mcc jabbering frauds.
must have spin 1/2 or spin 3/2.

Actually the Deutron is observed to have spin 1

Blah, what else to expect from lying apes!
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor

>
Jan

--