Sujet : Re: ? ? ?
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 02. Apr 2024, 20:48:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <514udk-mcm71.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-101-lowlatency (x86_64))
In sci.physics The Starmaker <
starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
the fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect ...time.
That depends on which definition of the word time you are using.
a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process,
or condition exists or continues
b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which
succeed one another from past through present to future
< snip old crap >
The operative word is "detect" not time.
de·tect
/d?'tek(t)/
verb
discover or identify the presence or existence of.
to discover the true character of
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+detect
identify the presence of time.
identify the existence of time.
The fact is...there is no devise on earth that can detect, identify, the presence and existence of ...time.
The fact is what you post is childish, ignorant twaddle.
Re: ? ? ?
Re: ? ? ?