Sujet : Re: ? ? ?
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.mathDate : 17. Mar 2024, 07:59:41
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l5nid3F5fapU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
Am 15.03.2024 um 12:19 schrieb Connie Bairashevski Balashoff:
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
stupid. There is no ˝𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝘆_𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀_𝗶𝘀_𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲,_𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝘆_𝗻𝗼𝘁˝ in physics.
Idiot. That statement does NOT exists.
>
No, such a statement does exist, because I had written 'possibly this is
true, possibly not'. The actual fact is unknown, at least by me, hence
we are allowed to speculate. Possibly time has to do with entropy,
possibly not. If you want an answer to this riddle ('what time actually
is'), you need to find it yourself.
>
not in physics, my friend. Try 𝙣𝙚𝙬_𝙖𝙜𝙚, 𝙘𝙖𝙗𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙝 etc, but that's stupid. The
time used in physics is pretty well defined, 𝗔𝗡𝗗_𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗗, by consent. You
I'm not quite certain, what you are trying to say.
In physics time is a quantity and measured in seconds. But that does not say very much about how long a second is and why time exists in the first place.
TH
Re: ? ? ?
Re: ? ? ?