Re: Getting there at last...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Getting there at last...
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 30. Mar 2024, 08:54:09
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:

>
Maybe you like my 'book'
>
>
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
>
TH
>
 From your book, the following quote
***
This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>
Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.
Sure.
If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two endpoints of the way found.
If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his fault.

In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.
No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.

People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
heavenly light in.
Well, that's not quite true, neither.
Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because they were questioning the authority of the church.
That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be punished by death.
This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene in physics anymore.

>
The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
there.
Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.

While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
respect.
You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.

Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.
You invented the railgun????
TH

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Mar 24 * Re: ? ? ?47bertitaylor
23 Mar 24 `* Re: ? ? ?46Thomas Heger
23 Mar 24  +* Re: ? ? ?33bertitaylor
26 Mar 24  i+* Re: ? ? ?12Arindam Banerjee
26 Mar 24  ii`* Re: ? ? ?11Thean Nogushi Hatoyama
27 Mar 24  ii `* Re: ? ? ?10Arindam Banerjee
27 Mar 24  ii  `* Re: ? ? ?9Jed László Barabás
27 Mar 24  ii   `* Re: ? ? ?8Arindam Banerjee
27 Mar 24  ii    `* Re: ? ? ?7Thaddeus Horiatis Demetrious
28 Mar 24  ii     `* Re: ? ? ?6Arindam Banerjee
28 Mar 24  ii      `* Re: ? ? ?5Yasmani Hasekura
28 Mar 24  ii       `* Re: ? ? ?4Arindam Banerjee
28 Mar 24  ii        `* Re: ? ? ?3Leland Behtenev Basov
28 Mar 24  ii         +- Re: ? ? ?1Arindam Banerjee
28 Mar 24  ii         `- Re: ? ? ?1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 24  i`* Getting there at last...20Arindam Banerjee
28 Mar 24  i `* Re: Getting there at last...19Thomas Heger
28 Mar 24  i  `* Re: Getting there at last...18Arindam Banerjee
30 Mar 24  i   `* Re: Getting there at last...17Thomas Heger
30 Mar 24  i    `* Re: Getting there at last...16Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24  i     `* Re: Getting there at last...15Thomas Heger
2 Apr 24  i      +* Re: Getting there at last...4Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24  i      i`* Re: Getting there at last...3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Apr 24  i      i `* Re: Getting there at last...2Arindam Banerjee
8 Apr 24  i      i  `- Re: Getting there at last...1Thomas Heger
3 Apr 24  i      `* Re: Getting there at last...10Thomas Heger
3 Apr 24  i       +- Re: Getting there at last...1Yusney Turaev Momotov
4 Apr 24  i       `* Re: Getting there at last...8Arindam Banerjee
5 Apr 24  i        `* Re: Getting there at last...7Thomas Heger
6 Apr 24  i         `* Re: Getting there at last...6Arindam Banerjee
6 Apr 24  i          `* Re: Getting there at last...5Thomas Heger
6 Apr 24  i           +- Re: Getting there at last...1Jim Pennino
7 Apr 24  i           `* Re: Getting there at last...3Arindam Banerjee
7 Apr 24  i            `* Re: Getting there at last...2Thomas Heger
8 Apr 24  i             `- Re: Getting there at last...1Arindam Banerjee
23 Mar 24  `* Re: ? ? ?12Yatzyk Trampotova
25 Mar 24   `* Re: ? ? ?11Thomas Heger
25 Mar 24    +- Re: ? ? ?1Evasio Alexandropoulos
2 Apr 24    `* Re: ? ? ?9Jim Pennino
2 Apr 24     `* Re: ? ? ?8Jim Pennino
4 Apr 24      `* Re: ? ? ?7Jim Pennino
4 Apr 24       `* Re: ? ? ?6Jim Pennino
4 Apr 24        +* Re: ? ? ?2Volney
4 Apr 24        i`- Re: ? ? ?1Jim Pennino
5 Apr 24        +* Re: ? ? ?2Colin Mcdonald
5 Apr 24        i`- Re: ? ? ?1Jim Pennino
5 Apr 24        `- Re: ? ? ?1Jim Pennino

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal