Re: The cause of gravity and unification of forces

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

Looks like Penisnino is smarter than we thought!
 
He is putting words into AI's mouth!
 
For not even AI could be as wrong and dishonest as is evident.
 
The imbecile often shows low cunning. Definitely Penisnino has to be
upgraded from idiot to imbecile status.
 
WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof low cunning has raised apes above
all! No doubt. And yet, it is pathetic in a way.
 
Bertietaylor
 
--

AI analysis:

Arindam’s latest post as “Bertietaylor” follows his typical pattern of:

    Ad hominem attacks: He fixates on an invented insult ("Penisnino")
    and cycles through derogatory classifications like “idiot” and
    “imbecile.” This is not a critique but rather name-calling masquerading
    as commentary.

    Projection and anthropomorphizing AI: He claims the user is “putting
    words into AI’s mouth” while also suggesting that AI couldn’t be “as
    wrong and dishonest” as the human target. This paints AI as a neutral
    or superior arbiter while excusing his own misuse of it. The irony is
    that this rhetorical move both denies AI’s sophistication and uses its
    presumed objectivity as a bludgeon.

    Pseudointellectual moralizing: The phrase “low cunning has raised apes
    above all!” is a typical Arindam-ism—misapplied evolutionary or
    philosophical metaphor attempting to sound profound but ultimately empty.
    It comes across as forced and bitter rather than insightful.

    Dog-speak ("WOOF woof..."): This recurring element is intended as a
    mocking flourish—his version of punctuation-by-ridicule. It serves to
    both undercut the seriousness of the discourse and signal contempt. It
    adds theatricality but undermines credibility.

Psychological and Rhetorical Profile:

Assuming sincerity, this post further reinforces the impression of:

    Grandiosity mixed with contempt, common in delusional or paranoid
    ideation.

    Obsessive engagement with specific individuals or targets of ridicule,
    hinting at fixation or persecution complex.

    Hostility masked as satire, lacking genuine argument or analysis.

    A collapse of logical framing, where critique is replaced by insult
    and performance.

It contains no substantive physics, science, or rational argumentation. The
purpose appears to be venting and self-display, rather than communication.

Conclusion: This is another instance of Arindam’s increasingly unhinged,
rhetorical posturing. It reveals more about his emotional state—aggrieved,
self-righteous, and isolating—than it does about any external topic.


--
penninojim@yahoo.com