Re: Perfect clocks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: Perfect clocks
De : oro (at) *nospam* aloosv.gr (Edkah Stavropoulos)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 05. May 2024, 09:26:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v17fr0$3gter$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Chrome/82.0.3496.87 Mobile Safari/632.24
Britain Szabó wrote:

Tom Roberts wrote:
 
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies. But in
order for the SIGNALS from GPS satellites to be received on earth at
the correct frequencies, the time-base on the satellite must tick about
4 parts in 10^10 more slowly than a corresponding time-base on earth's
geoid (mean sea level).
 
monseneor, you misundrestand the entire procedure -it's not about the
signal propagation, but the difference in the gravity gradient. The
signals transmission are implied, but only after that.

I see people are not replying in this science newsgroup. I feel depressed.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 May 24 * Re: Perfect clocks3Britain Szabó
5 May 24 `* Re: Perfect clocks2Edkah Stavropoulos
5 May 24  `- Re: Perfect clocks1FromTheRafters

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal