Re: Getting there at last...

Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
 

>
Maybe you like my 'book'
>
>
 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
>
TH

>
 From your book, the following quote
***
This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and
GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without
knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an
undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but
possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should
be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). ***
>
Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet)
notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well.

 Sure.
 If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist.
 It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two endpoints of the way found.
 If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his fault.
 

In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it.

 No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory.
 

People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in
crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let
heavenly light in.

 Well, that's not quite true, neither.
 Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because they were questioning the authority of the church.
 That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be punished by death.
 This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene in physics anymore.
 

>
The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not
there.

 Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic.
 

While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows
jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see
neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and
their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful
nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves
respect.

 You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'.
 

Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to
physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun
for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their
warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new
discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen.

 You invented the railgun? ? ? ?

Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy, perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015, and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of youtube videos. My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction.  (Since I have used a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My detailed analysis shows inertia violation.  Which means, outing inertia as a sacred principle, and consequently outing entropy, laws of thermodynamics, quantum, relativity, big bang, finite expanding universe, etc. In short, upgrading Newton and dismissing Einstein.  Mathematically, e=0.5mVV(N-k)N and c(V)=c+V, the former meaning that energy is constantly created and destroyed in our infinite universe and the latter showing the Doppler effect cause.
That led to my finding the cause of gravity, novas and supernovas. Well, I am glad that the US has appropriated my new design for the rail gun, and the Chinese too have used it to launch aircraft. Both, very recently.  I have no doubt that commercial aircraft too will take off with such rail gun launches, requiring short take off lengths. Just a few million amps going down the belly of the craft, providing extraordinary force.
All the above information detailed in the links below:
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
***
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
*****
Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ
Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ
Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ
Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ
Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ
Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ
*******
2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics
****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ
The cause of gravity https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ
Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ
*****

  TH