Re: Acceleration's higher orders

Liste des GroupesRevenir Γ  physics 
Sujet : Re: Acceleration's higher orders
De : oaa (at) *nospam* kieaw.pl (Andrea Krakowski)
Groupes : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Suivi-à : sci.math sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
Date : 24. Apr 2024, 16:11:47
Autres entΓͺtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <v0b7fj$80k5$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
J. J. Lodder wrote:

gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
William O. Davis analyzed the system which was referred to by John W.
Campbell, Jr. as "the fourth law of motion" - i.e., jerk.  Davis and G.
Harry Stine got together and tested the invention.  They hung it from a
wire and oriented it so the supposed thrust would be horizontal.  There
was no net thrust.  The "weight loss" was due to nonlinearities in the
bathroom scales because of the thumping around of the weights.
 
Yes, a mistake that is made over and over again.
There was some ado some time ago about some students who had put a
gyroscope on a precision 'balance'.
They noticed a change of weight that depended on the sense of rotation.
Apparently the bearings are smoother in the direction in which they are
normally run, producing less vibration to rectify, Jan

nonsense, the center of mass is moving along the axis of rotation, which is a fact. See a doctor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum#/media/File:Greater_Germanic_Reich.png

𝗧𝗔π—₯𝗧𝗔π—₯π—œπ—”_π—˜π—«π—£π—Ÿπ—”π—œπ—‘π—˜π——_𝗣𝗧._10_-_π—ͺπ—”π—¦π—§π—˜_π— π—”π—‘π—”π—šπ—˜π— π—˜π—‘π—§,_π—§π—›π—˜_π—šπ—œπ—Ÿπ——π—˜π——_π—”π—šπ—˜_2022-04-22 https://b%69%74%63%68ute.com/video/jgztuv98EroM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Apr 24 o Re: Acceleration's higher orders1Andrea Krakowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal