Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à physics 
Sujet : Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics
De : banerjeeadda1234 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Arindam Banerjee)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Date : 27. Apr 2024, 14:50:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <R2vy4ReqoDmJCXWFYQEBiOTbj-Y@jntp>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 27/04/2024 à 19:50, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
 
 That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does
NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely theoretical.
My evidence is experimental.
 Correct, merely experimental.
Heh-heh.
Now the e=mcc wallahs will say the Sun goes around the Earth.
And the Moon is a superstructure, created by our distant ancestors.  They have even made a movie about it, "Moonfall" that I saw yesterday.
These guys si

It stands falsified by a reliable theory.
A theory is a conjecture that is widely shared. It is falsified by experimental evidence.
Of course, that is from the scientific standpoint, not the theological standpoint.
But then, physics is pure theology now, with e=mcc as dogma and Einstein as God-Clown-Baby.
 FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
do conserve energy-momentum.
No, they do not. Force = Magnetic field times current times length of conductor in a nice vector relationship, with only one current as variable, is intrinsically without reaction.  It is most widely used by all electrical and electronics engineers.  It is the basis for modern electric motor design.

If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
and how these equations must be modified.
Nothing wrong with them. They are perfectly correct. My only grouse is why the name of Lorentz should be there, it should be replaced by Heaviside, for the vector notation he introduced.  And the Lorentz force must be renamed as Thomson-Heaviside Force, or abbreviated as THE force. Out with Lorentz!
Maxwell in, Einstein out, is the word. The universe is full of aether, it is infinite, and all matter linked with lines of electric force.
No big bang, no black holes, extreme cold below our feet at the cores of the planets and stars.
Stars have trillion year cycles of birth and death, with gaining hydrogen cover from nebulas and losing them to nebulas.
Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon, like strong nuclear force.

As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
Hardly. The Arindam-Newton Laws of Motion will take humanity to the stars, after expanding all over the solar system.
And all the books on relativity-depravity and quantum-bunkum will be burnt in a huge bonfire that will make the fires in Nalanda and Alexandria universities look like small campfires.
Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa devils.

Jan

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Apr 24 * Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics5Arindam Banerjee
27 Apr 24 `* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics4Ross Finlayson
28 Apr 24  +* Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics2bertietaylor
28 Apr 24  i`- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1bertietaylor
27 Jun 24  `- Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics1Arindam Banerjee

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal