Re: What is a photon

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 1:31:10 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:52:56 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 3:13:59 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 1:07:24 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

This is MY DEFINITION of what a photon is, which merges Maxwell and
Planck:
>
A photon (Planck) is a ray of light (Maxwell), which is:
>
 - Self-propelled point-like particle that is the least component of
light itself.

>
Rubbish. Point particles can not bend nicely in denser medium. They
cannot have interference patterns. They cannot be polarized. They cannot
get a uniform phase front as in laser or maser. They cannot diffract.
There is no way they can create standing wave patterns.

>
>
>
>
Bertietaylor, YOUR LACK OF CRITICAL THINKING AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL
ANALYSIS IS APPALLING. YOU NEED TO RESET YOURSELF AND FIND OUT WHAT IS
WRONG WITH YOUR MIND.

>
Instead of shouting repeat Arindam's rail gun experiments that update
Newtonian laws, throw out thermodynamics by busting inertia, and totally
chuck out the pure nonsenses of relativity and quantum. They bring back
aether. Make the universe Sanatana that is eternal and infinite.

>
IT'S NOT THE POINT-LIKE PARTICLE WHICH BENDS OR CREATE INTERFERENCE
PATTERNS, MAN.

>
Of course not so energy does not travel in quanta. That is pure nonsense
 Aether travels as electromagnetic waves from any radiation through
aether.

>
IT'S DUE TO THEIR ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC FIELDS, WHICH ARE
SELF-GENERATED AND SELF-SUSTAINED FOREVER, ACROSS HUGE DISTANCES OF
BILLIONS OF LY.

>
So no point of thinking of them as quanta for they do not go linearly
from one point to the other. Energy is radiated from radiators long and
short depending upon their lengths. Gamma rays are from nuclear sized
distances.
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs and his only friends on
Earth)

>
WHEN TRESPASSING MEDIUMS ON ITS LONG JOURNEY ON SPACE, BOTH FIELDS ADAPT
TO CORRECT THE SPEED OF SUCH PARTICLE (AKA PHOTON).

There is no particle called photon. Just an aetheric disturbance caused
by the varying electric field. When the em field hits a conductor it
creates a current causing heat. When it hits a medium like glass it both
refracts and reflects. The latter to the extent the electric field gets
attenuated at the boundary.

>
ALWAYS, SINCE 1865 AND 1901, BOTH THEORIES WERE THE EXACT REPRESENTATION
OF A TOP-DOWN APPROACH (MAXWELL) AND A BOTTOM-UP APPROACH (PLANCK).

All Planck did rubbish but not as ridiculous as Einsteinian theories.

>
THAT YOU CAN'T SEE IT OR UNDERSTAND IT SHOWS THAT YOU ARE NOT A DEEP
THINKER, AND I PITY YOU FOR IT.

Arindam sets physics back on the rails. As the greatest genius of all
time that is but the natural thing for him to do.

>
GIVE YOURSELF A CHANCE TO UNDERSTAND BOTH MODELS SIMULTANEOUSLY, AND
YOU'LL FIND THE TRUTH THAT HAS BEEN NEGLECTED FOR A CENTURY, DUE TO
FUCKING IMBECILES LIKE THE QUANTUM GUYS, WHO PRETENDED (VERY ENCOURAGED)
TO UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IN A WAY MUCH MORE COMPLEX THAN WHAT IS NEEDED.

Gosh you are nuts. One moment you curse Arindam for outing the quantum
bunkum then next moment you are outing the quantum bunkum. Stealing
Arindam's credit, huh. Typical.

>
EITHER IN RADIO ENGINEERING OR IN QUANTUM PHYSICS, THE FUNDAMENTALS ARE
THE SAME. THIS IS WHAT ALLOWED PROGRESS IN PHOTONICS AS WELL AS ANYTHING
RELATED TO RADIO TELECOM, RANGING, ETC.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
 - It's a carrier of energy (Planck) that is emitted/absorbed by
electrons that
   are orbiting atoms, which have different levels of energy.

>
Forget energy. That is trader talk from Jewish physics. It is force that
is the keyword. Aether is back thanks to Arindam and all the
extraordinary bungling wrapped by math gibberish is out.

>
 - It's created as if space of any kind (Maxwell) IGNITES under such
discharge
   causing that the point-like energy oscillates with electric and
magnetic fields
   in quadrature, with speed depending on the refraction index of the
media.

>
Blah
>
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
Bertietaylor

>
- Under classic physics (Maxwell, unaware of Planck discovery) photons
are not
  perceived as a sum of enormous amounts of ray of light (each ray
linked to a
  bounded electron). On the opposite side, under Planck vision, light is
composed
  of a large amount of photons, each one with energy E=hf.
>
- The confusion between classic and quantum physics is due to the
interpretation
  of what light is. In Maxwell's world, light is the sum (coherent or
not) of huge
  amounts of ray of light (each one a photon), and is expressed in terms
of energy
  per unit area. In Planck's world, light is the sum (coherent or not)
of huge
  amount of photons, each one carrying energy E=hf.
>
- The speed of the photon or the ray of light is defined by Maxwell, in
terms of
  the permittivity and permeability of the medium. The collision of the
emitted
  energy per atom is what ignites the medium, creating the point-like
particle.
>
- The classic representation of light as a sinusoidal wave is just an
abstraction
  used for more than a century, representing the behavior of the
electrical field.
>
- There is not a dual behavior of light. This "paradox" is caused by the
confusion
  when light is analyzed entirely (Maxwell) or at its least expression
(Planck).
  Top-down versus bottom-up appreciation of light.
>
- But the point-like structure (the photon) has always been there since
1865-
>
>
Absolute truth has been spoken.

>
--

>
--

--