Sujet : Re: Relativity theory from other angles
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 21. Oct 2024, 01:35:13
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <-9acnU_utusqPIj6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 10/20/2024 01:54 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
So if we forget iwrong Aristotle and obsolete steam engines explained by
Carnot, we need have no use for conservation of energy laws and entropy
- we say bye-bye to the laws of thermodynamics, following Arindam's
inertia violation experiment.
>
From that advance, getting rid of the depravity of relativity and the
bunkum of quantum is but a step.
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
No, that's foolish, also that's a mis-reading,
what is meant is that there are other regimes of relative
and that quantum mechanics is a continuum mechanics,
then as with regards to that this mostly means revisiting
earlier abandoned theories, like vis-viva, Lagrange principle,
superstring/supercorde theory as a continuum mechanics,
pseudomomentum, Heaviside/Larmor/Faraday field theories,
aether field theory, the "revisit Heisenberg, Hubble, Higgs"
which since I mentioned that decades ago has seen Aspect-like
photons as definitely waves and all, JWST panning Hubble,
and Higgs and Little Higgs, for a theory with a gravity
like a fall-gravity, that this is for improving _mathematics_
and resultig improving _mathematical physics_, and
_explaining_ it in apologetics, in foundations.