Re: What is "local time"?

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 6:06:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 05.11.2024 o 01:50, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:34:49 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
Talking to scumbags like you and your
fellow scumbags I have to descend partially
to your level, I admit. But I don't
slander like you; you're am idiot and
it's quite possible that you don't know
what a slander is, but somehow I doubt it.

>
"Slander is a legal term that refers to a false, ORAL

>
Yeah, yeah, I've heard it before;

But he doesn't acknowledge truth when it hits him between
the eyes:
“To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are
proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides
to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami

your screams

The only screaming is coming from Wozniak.  He libels continually,
but he can't take it when someone points out the probable
consequences of his words.

about my alleged booze and marijuana
weren't slanders because you only wrote them.

At most it would be libel, not slander.  But what I write
about Wozniak isn't libel because he hasn't proven it's
false.  All we have is his word for it, and, as everyone
can attest, his word is no good.

Woziliar doesn't know what slander is and lies about it
continually.  A written false statement cannot be slander,

>
Still, somehow you've found ME slandering...

I was just coming down to his level so he could understand,
however vaguely, his error.

Lies have short legs, poor lying

Wozniak is projecting his own behavior again.  He's a hypocrite
with his feet connected directly to his hips.

piece of shit.

And his coprophilia is in clear evidence, as is his substance
abuse from his references to pink and purple elephants.
Some coprophiliacs eat it, so we may presume that Wozniak
eats his own words.

He is libeling EVERYONE who disagrees with his outrageous

>
Like any fanatic idiot-

More libelous ranting from a congenital liar, but it's unimportant
because Wozniak's opinions are worthless lies.

you deeply believe that together with your fellows you form
"EVERYONE".  No, you don't.

I wasn't including myself.  Wozniak has this obsessive compulsive
disorder which compels him to lie about facts, for example:
"Take just the case of the Sun moving towards Sirius. Then, the
frequency is shorter because the speed of the starlight from
Sirius is C + 5.5 m/sec."
Using the test equation c' = c + kv:
K. Brecher, "Is the Speed of Light Independent of the Velocity of the
Source?", Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 1051–1054, 1236(E) (1977).
"Uses observations of binary pulsars to put a limit on the source-
velocity dependence of the speed of light. k < 2 × 10−9.  Optical
Extinction is not a problem here, because the high-energy X-rays
used have an extinction length considerably longer than the distance
to the sources."
So the assertion that c' = c + v is refuted to 1 part in a billion.
This justifies the claim:
"Any ray of light moves in the 'stationary' system of co-ordinates
with the determined velocity c, whether the ray be emitted by a
stationary or by a moving body." ―Albert Einstein 1905
So Wozniak is libeling both Einstein and Brecher, plus numerous
other honest physicists who have confirmed that c' = c by actual
experiment.
And what is Wozniak's proof for his stupid assertion?  Nothing at
all except for his vacuous opinion.
“All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust,
sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”
 -- Douglas Adams
But c' = c is not an opinion.  It's confirmed by experiment, but
facts have no effect on stupid people.