Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr century,.

On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 11:49:42 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 31.10.2024 19:44, skrev rhertz:

<snip>

Every day a SUCKER is born. But nine SOB are born also.
>
Fuck the virus of relativism, worse than communism.

>
So we can conclude that Richard Hertz is right only if
all physicists and astronomers born after 1900 are frauds.
>
Nobody can demonstrate the idiocy of Richard Hertz better
than you, Richard!
>
Well done! :-D

Paul, as usual being an imbecile, a liar and a deceiver.
My post was about the deceptive numbers having 15 DIGITS that the site
provides.
It means resolving distances up to micrometers and orbital periods up to
1 nanosecond, BECAUSE these THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS are based on a
Keplerian GM = 1.3271246207314793E+11 km^3/s^2, WHICH IS ALSO A
THEORETICAL CALCULATION.
But imbeciles like you, Jan, etc., take the data of Horizons AS IF THEY
WERE TRUE!
The site was developed in order to be used by AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS
(hobbysts). The data CAN'T BE USED FOR ANY SERIOUS CALCULATION.
Watch this extract for Mercury, with 16 digits numbers. Only a very
retarded asshole can take them literally.
AND YOU ARE THE KING OF RETARDED, WITH SEVERE CRETINISM.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ephemeris Type:  Osculating Orbital Elements
Target Body: Mercury
Coordinate Center: Sun (body center) [500@10]3
Time Specification: Start=2024-11-01 TDB , Stop=2024-12-01, Step=1
(days)
Table Settings: defaults
Keplerian GM    : 1.3271246207314793E+11 km^3/s^2
ONE DAY EXAMPLE
2460644.500000000 = A.D. 2024-Nov-30 00:00:00.0000 TDB
Eccentricity, e EC= 2.056399766464924E-01
Periapsis distance, q (km) QR= 4.600069373883072E+07
Inclination w.r.t X-Y plane, i (degrees) IN= 7.003507142006237E+00
Longitude of Ascending Node, OMEGA, (degrees) OM= 4.829982941962585E+01
Argument of Perifocus, w (degrees) W = 2.919562648103304E+01
Time of periapsis (Julian Day Number) Tp=  2460651.099756300915
Mean motion, n (degrees/sec) N = 4.736504817596935E-05
Mean anomaly, M (degrees) MA= 3.329915522272663E+02
True anomaly, nu (degrees) TA= 3.192959187352151E+02
Semi-major axis, a (km) A = 5.790912481299353E+07
Apoapsis distance (km) AD= 6.981755588715634E+07
Sidereal orbit period (sec) PR= 7.600541197858339E+06
Now check the PRECISION of the above numbers, and tell me that they ARE
REAL NUMBERS, or the result of exaggerated calculations.
Watch the period PR: It's solved up to 9 nanoseconds.
Or the semi-major axis a. It's solved up to 53 micrometers.
Are you denying it, IMBECILE?
And you, because you are an asshole, USED THIS DATA in your stupid
paper.
IGNORANT!