Re: Wikipedia crackpottey

On 11/13/2024 12:35 PM, bertietaylor wrote:

Any relativist chappie around that may perhaps admit that after
contemplating the inertia violation experiment done by Arindam's new
design electromagentic rail gun, Einstein's 1905 paper "On the
electrodynamics of moving bodies" which heavily depended upon the notion
of inertia for the validity of e=mc^2, gets comprehensively trashed?

The e = mc^2 is just the first term in a Taylor series expansion
of K.E.
The infinitely-many rest of them are non- or "un-" linear.
A Meissnerized ingot may experience inertial "heft",
with regards to electro-motive force, and various
super-classical concerns, with regards to theories
like those of Fritz London, for whom the most and best
initial developments in superconductivity arrived,
then as with regards to the regions and so on.
The mechanics, "is", an inertial-system.
What you do is hit the ingot to spinning first off
the compulsator to give it some heft, then launch it.
Mechanics as usually relayed is, "under-defined".
Infinitely-many higher orders of acceleration and all, ....