Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:Alas, probably not. Thomas Heger has never understood the way commas are used in English and how it differs from how they are used in German. So although he is saying (probably correctly) that most of his 428 comments are wrong, he probably thinks he was saying that many of Einstein's statements were wrong, which is just his fantasy.
Am Montag000002, 02.06.2025 um 20:38 schrieb J. J. Lodder:Ah, some insight into yourself.Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:I have looked at that paper very carefully and wrote about 428 comments
[ … ]
I have actually (carefully!!) 'tested' that particular paper and found,The audience didn't think so.
that it is FULL of errors.
The number of errors (plus others issues like violation of formal
standards, missing references, bad language..) was so large (400+), that
I personally think, that Einstein was wilfully mocking the audience.
Au contraire, it was an instant succes,
among those who mattered.
Prestigeous univerisities starten trying to get Einstein
to accept a professorship.
about statements, which were in many cases wrong.
Just to help you: your comments are all wrong.--
There were other issues, too, but more related to expression, grammar,Irrelevant, for science.
violation of formal requirements and so forth.
Whether 'those who mattered' like my comments or not, that is not myThe fact that Einstein was accepted by everybody who mattered at the
concern.
time as one of their kind makes whatever you want to say irrelevant.
Most likely they don't, but that wouldn't make Einstein's text better.Science doesn't proceed by textual criticism. It is about content.
Is that really so hard to understand for you?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.