Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
De : julio (at) *nospam* diegidio.name (Julio Di Egidio)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Jun 2025, 12:42:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <102bq2v$1tfom$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 01/06/2025 14:41, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
<snip>
Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...
>
# A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
>
The observer from the future...
 "Decoherence as co-coherence."
 Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
(isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
a *co-holographic* principle.
Let me add this to the collection (thanks for the link):
"Experimental evidence for the physical delocalization of
individual photons in an interferometer" (Japan, 2025):
<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.00336>
Meanwhile, I was re-looking into relativistic dynamics:
it's all in terms of 4-vectors, and of course there is
a Lorentz factor everywhere.
There are *6 points x 2 diagrams* in my representation.
The irony with mainstream physics is, the real things,
i.e. the real position of a particle as well as what we
can observe of it, are suppressed, while "measurement"
as a set of procedures in a "plane of simultaneity",
which is unreal and, as far as I can tell, useless, is
the only and only only thing that is taken for serious,
together with the systematic suppression of the dual
of any relativistic diagram, i.e. what's actually
happening on board "the other" ship.
The fact that the *actual* "speed of light" (i.e. the
magnitude of the 4-velocity, but also its each component
singularly) is *infinite* (equal to \gamma(c) precisely),
not only implies a geometry where past and future both
matter, but rather makes me wonder if we can recover
basic quantum via plain optics...  (And I think for that
we/I need to work out a most basic version of the Twin
Paradox: the motif should be WYSIWYG.)
-Julio

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25 * [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.155Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.114Ross Finlayson
24 May 25 i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.113Julio Di Egidio
24 May 25 i +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Otniel Abuhov
24 May 25 i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25 i i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
25 May 25 i i `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Paul.B.Andersen
25 May 25 i  +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Delman Vamvakidis
25 May 25 i  i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Maciej Woźniak
25 May 25 i  i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Arden Vassilopulos
25 May 25 i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Walton Molnár
25 May 25 `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.139Julio Di Egidio
25 May 25  +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Bladimir Rudawski
26 May 25  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.137Ross Finlayson
26 May 25   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.136Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.115Julio Di Egidio
27 May 25    i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Ross Finlayson
27 May 25    ii`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun 25    i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.112Julio Di Egidio
1 Jun 25    i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
1 Jun 25    i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Carlis Bakurov
2 Jun 25    i +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.17Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 25    i i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Julio Di Egidio
5 Jun 25    i ii`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Ross Finlayson
5 Jun 25    i ii +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Maciej Woźniak
5 Jun 25    i ii +- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
5 Jun 25    i ii `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
3 Jun 25    i i`- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
11 Jun 25    i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Julio Di Egidio
11 Jun 25    i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio
26 May 25    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.118Paul.B.Andersen
26 May 25     +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.17Python
26 May 25     i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.16Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.15Python
26 May 25     i  `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.14Maciej Woźniak
26 May 25     i   `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Python
27 May 25     i    `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Richard Hachel
27 May 25     i     `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ross Finlayson
30 May 25     `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25      +* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.18Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25      i+- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Wilder Molostov
30 May 25      i+* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Richard Hachel
30 May 25      ii`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12J. J. Lodder
30 May 25      ii `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Ezekiel Beklemishev
31 May 25      i`* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.13Thomas Heger
1 Jun 25      i `* Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.12Thomas Heger
2 Jun 25      i  `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Thomas Heger
1 Jun 25      `- Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.11Julio Di Egidio

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal