Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1

On 01/06/2025 14:41, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

<snip>

Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...

>
# A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
>
The observer from the future...

 "Decoherence as co-coherence."
 Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
(isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
a *co-holographic* principle.

Let me add this to the collection (thanks for the link):
"Experimental evidence for the physical delocalization of
individual photons in an interferometer" (Japan, 2025):
<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.00336>
Meanwhile, I was re-looking into relativistic dynamics:
it's all in terms of 4-vectors, and of course there is
a Lorentz factor everywhere.
There are *6 points x 2 diagrams* in my representation.
The irony with mainstream physics is, the real things,
i.e. the real position of a particle as well as what we
can observe of it, are suppressed, while "measurement"
as a set of procedures in a "plane of simultaneity",
which is unreal and, as far as I can tell, useless, is
the only and only only thing that is taken for serious,
together with the systematic suppression of the dual
of any relativistic diagram, i.e. what's actually
happening on board "the other" ship.
The fact that the *actual* "speed of light" (i.e. the
magnitude of the 4-velocity, but also its each component
singularly) is *infinite* (equal to \gamma(c) precisely),
not only implies a geometry where past and future both
matter, but rather makes me wonder if we can recover
basic quantum via plain optics...  (And I think for that
we/I need to work out a most basic version of the Twin
Paradox: the motif should be WYSIWYG.)
-Julio