Re: SpaceTime

W dniu 02.06.2024 o 19:13, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 06/02/2024 09:57 AM, gharnagel wrote:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 02.06.2024 o 14:48, gharnagel pisze:

>
Since we don't really understand what "space-time" is,

>
Since you don't, you really should shut up,
Harrie.

>
>
Pot, kettle, black, Wozzie-fool.  You don't seem to understand
anything, so your fickle finger points right back at you :-))

 I'd only heard of that after there was re-syndicated "Laugh-In"
on the free OTA television I used to watch.
 I was like "this is amusing, yet what a bunch of flakes".
Horn-dogs and flakes, ....
 I quit watching television about a year ago yet have
already watched most what's considered "syndicated" television,
or the '70's and '80's and some of the '60's as it were.
  There is an idea that Maciej basically _is_ a tea-kettle,
and all he has to look at all day is the Parameterized-Post-Newtonian,
then also a translation chart to Naive-Einstein-SR's-Wrong-GR,
and he always has to re-compute to reflect what he thinks people
either way need the numbers both ways, and erupts "mumble".
   Of course the "Parameterized Post-Newtonian" _is_ the ephemeris
in effect, with regards to Earthly things the things near Earth.
 Most people know that dead-reckoning isn't really a thing,
then there's wide reliance on the constancy of light-speed,
and its effectively large value.

And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by your bunch of mumbling religious maniacs "improper"
clocks of TAI and GPS keep measuring t'=t, just like
all serious clocks always did.

 So, in a sense it's like "two wrongs".