Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics

W dniu 10.08.2024 o 18:27, gharnagel pisze:

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:13:59 +0000, Python wrote:

>
Le 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit :

>
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:

>
At first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while for
the PTB to come around.  But it didn't happen until experimental
evidence prevailed.

>
Only such an idiot believe these nonsensical
ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of
the idiot was not even consistent.

>
Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from his
outrageous fantasies :-))

>
It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claims
to be true.
>
IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound
"arguments".

 Yep, I often give him the benefit of the doubt and give him either
option.  It's a conundrum to determine which one is worse.  If he's
a liar AND God exists, then he goes to hell.  So it's better to be
stupid.  OTOH, if God doesn't exist, it's worse to be stupid.

It's amusing that such a piece of lying
shit is believing  God, you know. Sure,
Harrie, your lies won't be punished cause
you're lying for a just cause.
How about your lie of GPS clocks readings?
When reading of the one from Earth will be
2024-08-31 17:00:00,000000000-  what will
be the reading of the one from the
satellite? Numbers, please.
Still no answer, Harrie? Of course.