Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 24.08.2024 o 23:05, gharnagel pisze:

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:13:51 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 24.08.2024 o 14:08, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 4:11:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 24.08.2024 o 04:01, gharnagel pisze:

>
Wozniak forgets to include one definition, also.
A definition meant to include only the earth, not
some traveler moving at relativistic speed.

>
A lie, of course,

>
Nope, Wozniak is definitely wrong about this.
>

as expected from a relativistic idiot.

>
Wozniak demonstrates that he is the insulter-and
slanderer-in-chief once again.
>

No such limitations were included into the definition
of second in the physics of your idiot guru.

>
Saint Albert didn't define the second.  Wozniak is dead
wrong again.

>
Of course he didn't, he was too stupid
for that.

 So Wozniak asserts that anyone who doesn't define the second
is stupid.

A stinky lie/slander, of course, again.
So, what was the definition? Will you
finally write it, trash?
No. You will only write more insults,
more lies, more slanders. And more
completely idiotic dodges.

Why would a theoretical physicist need to define a second?

Because the existing definition was
killing his idiotic delusions
immediately.