Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 14:24:49 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:A lie, as expected from a piece of relativistic>Wozniak is projecting again, He's the one that has painted
W dniu 25.08.2024 o 16:02, gharnagel pisze:>>
:)) Wozniak is caught in his dishonesty again and projects it
away from himself. It is a logical extension of what he
deviously asserted: Einstein was to stupid to define the
second; therefore, anyone who doesn't define the second is
stupid.
No, Harmagel. It's not any logical extension,
it's just utterly ridiculous claim o a
cornered idiot.
himself into a corner.
So, what was the definitionI gave it
Not quite. The older ones are also mentionedHarmagel is grasping at straws again in a sorry attempt toThis is infantile copycatting. Not worthy of any more response.
distract from the elephant in the room.
I wasn't asking about the current definition of second,That's the only one there is.
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definitionI was asking about the definition valid in his idioticBecause there is no such thing.
physiccs in 1905 and up to the death of his idiot guru.
Will you finally write it?
Of course, not.
I'm not assuming anything right now, I applyWozniak is lying again and studiously ignoring the peanutHis assertion that relativity is inconsistent because it>
predicts that a moving observer would see a day on earth
as 99766 seconds instead of 86400
Not "instead" but "both". That's what inconsistency
is about.
butter barf all over himself.
He is assuming that Newtonian physics with its universal
time is true,
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.