Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 26.08.2024 o 04:56, gharnagel pisze:

On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 25.08.2024 o 17:21, gharnagel pisze:

>

 

Not quite. The older ones are also mentioned
there.

 But not asked about.  Irrelevant, anyway.
 

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

 Theoretical physicists don't define seconds.

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?
Just stop dodging and changing  the subject.

I apply the inconsistent assumptions of the physics
of your idiot guru and derive 2 denying
themself predictions. I can do it, because
the mumble of your idiot guru was not even
consistent.

 Wozniak is daydreaming. He has assumed his conclusion > based on Newtonian time assumption

Harmagel is lying, as expected from a
relativistic piece of shit. I apply the
definition of second valid in his moronic
physics (the whole of it, including
The Shit of his idiot guru) up to
1960-ies.