Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 26.08.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 4:45:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 26.08.2024 o 04:56, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

>
Theoretical physicists don't define seconds.

>
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?
Just stop dodging and changing  the subject.

 Repeating falsehoods don't make them true.

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

Harmagel is lying, as expected from a
relativistic piece of shit.

 Wozniak is projecting his own dishonesty, and insulting
and slandering, which he also projects.
 

I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic
physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his
idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.

 Wozniak is in denial of reality. 

The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
from?
His assertion is

misguided, dead wrong because he is basing it on
Newtonian (universal) time

A lie, as expected from a piece of relativistic
shit. I'm only applying the definition of second,
valid in the whole physics (including The
Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.