Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions>Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
W dniu 26.08.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:>>
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 4:45:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:>>
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?
Just stop dodging and changing the subject.
Repeating falsehoods don't make them true.
So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?
stock in trade.
Oh, it's just a reminding that you'reWozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed>I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic>
physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his
idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
Wozniak is in denial of reality.
The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
from?
A lie, as expected from a piece ofNope. The only way Wozniak can argue that 86400His assertion is misguided, dead wrong because he>
is basing it on Newtonian (universal) time
A lie,
seconds per day is valid for the moving observer is
by asserting Newtonian (universal) time.
Harmagel is lying since he knows very wellI'm only applying the definition of second,Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
valid in the whole physics (including The
Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
seconds only refers to earth.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.