Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]

W dniu 31.08.2024 o 17:16, Python pisze:

Le 31/08/2024 à 17:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 31.08.2024 o 16:52, Python pisze:

...

"This question doesn't matter" is a perfectly adequate answer
to a question that actually does not matter in the context

>
Python, [...] the context was - the [...]
[scientists] like you to spelling
the old, valid in 1905 (when [Einstein] lived
[...]) definition of second.
>
Of course, your lie of "doesn't matter" is also
ridiculous. Does [SR] make any numeric
predictions with units?

 It does.
 

if it does - how can
the definitions of these units irrelevant ?

 For SR certainly.

So, The Shit is making predictions like
"the result will be [n] seconds - and
what this second is doesn't matter for it?
Well, sorry, trash. Mistaken as always,
it absolutely does  matter  and with
"second" defined as it was in 1905 - The
Shit is not just insane mumble of some
insane crazie, it is self-denying insane
mumble of  some insane crazie.
Thus, of course, your hatred for  spelling
that  definition can't be a surprise.