Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 12:05, Python pisze:

Le 23/09/2024 à 11:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 23.09.2024 o 09:58, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>

On 17-Sept-24 11:16 am, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the transverse
and longitudinal beams.
Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed more
than the transverse.
This is the difference that should have been detected by the
Michelson-Morley experiment.
As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations without
an ether.
Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz
Transformation in this context is nonsensical.

>
If you look for equations that describe a universe in which all
observers measure the same speed for light, then you arrive at the
Lorentz transformation. This is why Einstein and Lorentz ended up in the
same place - they both started with the same premise.

>
It is where Einstein started

>
Unfortunately, even with all of his madness
he was unable to stick to the idiocy for a
long time, and his GR shit had to withdraw
from it.
>

 How could you say?

Simply.

You refused to follow science courses as

Save your ravings and insults, poor stinker,
just answer:
"All observers measure the same speed for
light" - is this a rule valid in your GR
shit? No  exceptions?