Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

W dniu 08.10.2024 o 09:41, Thomas Heger pisze:

Am Sonntag000006, 06.10.2024 um 13:49 schrieb Richard Hachel:
...

In any case, the concept that I give is certain, because it alone explains the Langevin paradox in a truly credible way (which avoids the unjustified objections of cranks and anti-relativists).
>
If you want a correct reasoning, you are obliged to go through the relativistic zoom effect, and this cannot be done either without an instantaneous interaction of light in the longitudinal direction.
>
I repeat, there exists for each observer, each entity of the universe a hyperplane of simultaneity. Everyone agrees on that.
>
But for me, it is personal, relative.
>
All the elements of a given frame have their own.
>
Physicists do not want to hear this.
>
They then come to imagine an abstract and false theory, with a common and absolute present time hyperplane for the entire frame.
>
This is obviously ridiculous and the opposite is easily demonstrable mathematically since we have a mathematical absurdity on apparent speeds), but not experimentally for the moment.

 I do not want to insist on my own ideas, but had the concept of local time, too.

I've told you already: feel fre to name
your Great Mystical Youdontknowwhat with
any word you want, just leave "time" alone,
this one already has a meaning and it is
important.