Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:34:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:Right, you don't know much. Typical>Says the congenital liar :-))
W dniu 16.10.2024 o 05:45, gharnagel pisze:>>
As usual, Wozniak is conflating two different
concepts.
As usual, Harrie spits.
And say nonsense about things he admits hewhich Wozniak knows nothing about, which is why
doesn't know much about.
he keeps conflating two different things.
Well, it's not usual that he admits.I don't know much, but I'm always observing.
I don't refuse to see something justOh, there is a wide variety of thingsWozniak is likely to get hit by a falling
that change in nature. Time, however,
is not any of them. There is no time
in nature.
rock; that is, one that is changing its
position in space as a function of time
passing.
It's a purely virtual abstract inventedThat's only ONE definition. Wozniak is a
by humans - for the purpose of describing.
Describing nature and other things.
poor observer because he refuses to see the
other one. This one:
"Time is what keeps everything from happening at
once" -- Ray Cummings
This is the one as real as a punch in the face.It may. Time remains purely virtual abstract
The punch may come from a person (who is also a
part of nature), or it may come from a falling
rock.
An assertion of an ignorant idiot mysticianTime is almost always present in anyWozniak has a weak mind because he can't
description of anything. That's why
it appears for weak minds to be something
real.
understand that there are two kinds of
"time": the real one in nature
Nope.Clocks are clocks, theories are theories.Agreed. Time is a part of nature; it's neither
Time is obviously not any of them.
clocks nor theories.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.