Re: What is "local time"?

W dniu 23.10.2024 o 14:28, gharnagel pisze:

On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 5:56:19 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 23.10.2024 o 05:57, gharnagel pisze:

>
Does everything happen at once?  No, it doesn't.  Did
the invention of clocks keep everything from happening
at once?  No, it didn't.

>
>
Sure, sure - time(i.e. "what clocks indicate")
had nothing in common with that.

 Dishonest Wozniak dis-invented the rest :-)
 

Did humans invent time so everything doesn't
happen at once?  No, they didn't.

 Which refutes Wozniak's baloney-filled assertion
that time is strictly a human invention.

Nope. It just shows that time has nothing
in common with that.

Wozniak needs to lay off the booze.

>
slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk  /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us  /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that
damages their reputation, or the making of
such a statement.

 Wolowitz has no proof that it's slander.

Why would I need it a proof, poor trash?
Am I a prosecutor?
Without proof it is still a slander. What
was that Socrates was saying about a slander?

 

BTW:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephant_(animal)
I was a bit mistaken about real elephants never
pink. Time - part of nature is rather like
purple elephants.

 Of course there are no pink elephants.  They only exist
in Willowwisp's besotted imagination :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephant_(animal)
Not quite.
But still, for sure there is no time in nature.

What is apparent to an utter relativistic idiot doesn't
matter.

 Whether or not time is solely a human invention has nothing
to do with relativity.

An assertion of an utter relativistic idiot
(being simultaneously a piece of lying shit,
BTW) is no way an argument.

Nope. Harnagel is wrong that it isn't. He admits
himself - he doesn't know much about the subject -
but being a DK idiot he still acts as if he knew
everything.

 :-))
 Does everything happen at once?  No, it doesn't.  Did
the invention of clocks keep everything from happening
at once?  No, it didn't.  Did humans invent time so
everything doesn't happen at once?  No, they didn't.

Conclusion: time has little in common with things
not happening at once.

Yes, they are. UTC doesn't change for a fast
observer, other real times neither. Sorry,
poor trash.

>
More attempts to redefine the discussion about relativity.
Complete bull merde (pardon my French).

>
Just pointing some properties of a real time.

 Whether or not time is solely a human invention has nothing
to do with relativity.

Somehow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_standard
none of the real times mentioned there
dilates.
See, poor trash, as a human invention time
and clocks are obeying common sense. Not
the nature. Nor some religious maniacs
self-appointed to speak in the name of
the nature.
You may gedanke a dilating time and clocks
indicating it - sure. Or you may gedanke
purple elephants; similar bullshit.