Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru

W dniu 26.10.2024 o 14:48, Python pisze:

Le 26/10/2024 à 14:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
>
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.

  No.
 

Some  fanatic idiots screaming "NO!!!"
can't change anything, the mumble of
their beloved guru was not even consistent
and it has been proven.