Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru

W dniu 08.11.2024 o 16:18, gharnagel pisze:

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 6:18:35 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 08.11.2024 o 00:57, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:36:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
>
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
>
>
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

>
Cutting and pasting this nonsense indicates
some kind of obsession, perhaps OCD.

>
Raving, spitting and slandering won't help
anything,

 That's right,

That's absolutely right and despite mad
ravings of you and your fellow scumbags
the mumble of your idiot guru remains not
even consistent, as it's been proven.

Wozniak is the only one "slandering" here

It was not me screaming about booze and
marijuana and it wasn't karma too,
it was Harnagel, poor lying piece of
shit.