Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:15:11 +0000, rhertz wrote:

>
----------------------------
gharnagel, with a heavy heart I've to tell you that you are A FUCKING
RETARDED, struggling to fight your COGNITIVE DISSONANCE.

Your "heavy heart" is a consequence of your ButtHertz.

If the master TCXO clock ON THE GPS SV is working in M2 mode,

Which is the only it can work for that past several decades.

at 10,229,999.995430 Hz, ALL THE CARRIER FREQUENCIES SYNTHESIZED FROM IT
have a LOWER NOMINAL VALUE than those of the twin TCXO working on Earth.

Carrier frequencies are irrelevant, as you've been told by Paul.

Your STUPID RELATIVITY SAYS THAT THE PERCEPTION OF FREQUENCIES AT
GROUND LEVEL are MULTIPLES of the local 10,230,000.000000 Hz
frequency. DO YOU ACCEPT THIS?

I'm not aware of any frequencies generated at ground level except the
10.23 MHz master clock.  Why would anyone want any multiples thereof?

So, according to your FUCKING RELATIVITY and Schwarzschild, the proper
frequencies of both clocks are:
>
M1 frequency at Earth's station.
M2 frequency at GPS SV.
>
>
The Δf/f = -4.4647E-10  frequency shift allegedly caused by BLUE
SHIFTING and SR,

I've shown you that the so-called "SR" part is actually contained in
the Schwarzschild equation.  Are you mathematically-incompetent?

which causes the 38.5 usec difference in the daily accumulation of
counts from the SV clock working at M1 frequency DISAPPEAR if the L1
carrier is recovered at ground level and the frequency of
10,230,000.000000 Hz is also recovered, dividing the L1 nominal
frequency by 154 (EXACTLY).

As you have asserted, the signal containing the onboard clock signal
is digital and is transmitted exactly as read from the onboard clock.
THAT is not time dilated or Doppler-shifted.  You seem to have an
obsession about the carrier frequency due to some mental disorder.

The scenario, in your rotten relativistic brain, is:
>
The local count in the orbiting GPS SV, for 86400 sec,

Whose 18640 seconds?  The onboard oscillator frequency has been
decreased.  Does that frequency drive the clock timing?  Do you
believe it doesn't?  Can you prove it.  You are just making stuff
up out of pure vacuum.

883,871,999,608 pulses, while the daily local count at ground
station is 883,872,000,000 pulses.
>
The clock at the GPS SV is locally counting LESS PULSES (38.5 us) than
the clock at ground station. It's the MATHEMAGICS OF RELATIVITY that
makes this difference disappear while radiating L1 carrier from the GPS
SV to the ground station. So, the CLAIM IS THAT the SV clock HAS TO BE
WORKING AT M2 FREQUENCY.
>
The difference digital counters would register is of 395 pulses which,
with a period of 97.7517106549365 ns gives a daily difference of
(NEGATIVE)
-38.5970696442754 us, which is what relativists claim as the "error"
between both clocks.
>
If you have (and you do since the first GPS SV) a second clock
(Rubidium) on the satellite, IT WILL LOCALLY COUNT THE SAME 86,400
SECONDS than the Cs clock on the Earth station.

All onboard atomic clocks work through a synthesizer to generate the
10.299+ MHz M2 signal.  But you haven't defined WHICH 186400 seconds
you're talking about.

If you don't understand the above, nothing I can do to fix your
deviated mind.

If the butt Hertz, there's nothing I can do about it.

When the onboard Rubidium clock (used as an arbiter) marks 86,400 sec,
the counter associated with the onboard Cesium clock will register:
>
(86,400 - 38.5970696442754 X 10^-06) SECONDS.
>
Are you really that kind of imbecile that CAN'T UNDERSTAND the above,
which was written following the RULES that relativists claim? So much
of an idiot are you?

I guess it would take an idiot to believe that ButtHertz can
understand reality.

I'm not going to waste more time with you, gharnagel. I prefer
to teach differential geometry to my dog, which I'm sure it will
ace it, instead of you.

I doubt if ButtHertz understands differential geometry.  He's all
talk and no comprehension.
A man driving down the road sees a sign in front of a house
that says “$5 for talking dog”
The man is perplexed and decides to pull over to investigate.
After parking he walks up to the porch where a man is sitting
in a rocking chair enjoying the day.
The driver asks “I saw your sign about a talking dog? Where
can I see this dog?”
To which the man rocking simply points to the backyard and
says “in his house along the back fence”
The driver begins to walk to the side of the house, along the
side of the house and into the backyard where he sees a dog laying in
front of a dog house.
The driver asked the dog “are you the talking dog?”
The dog simply replies “yup”
To which the driver replies “that’s amazing how did you learn
to talk”
The dog begins ..” when I was a puppy the CIA picked me up and
brought me in and taught me how to speak several different
languages. One of my languages was Arabic. The Iraq War breaks
out and they decided to send me over to Iraq and collect
information. Who is going to expect that a dog could understand
Arabic, right? Well then the war ends and I win a Bronze Star.
I return to the US and I join the TSA. I sniff out drugs, guns,
explosives and win all sorts of accolades. I eventually retire,
find myself a nice bitch, have some puppies who grow up and
move out and this is where I finally retire too.”
The driver who is absolutely stunned at this point looks at the
dog and says “that’s amazing“ and then swiftly walks back to the
front of the house.
When he gets to the front of the house he confronts the homeowner
and says “$5?! That’s all you want for that talking dog is $5?!
To which the homeowner replies “That dog is a liar, he’s never
done any of that stuff”
Just like ButtHertz, his dog is a liar.